Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk difference?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk difference?
From: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:07:05 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

Are you being facetious?  Towertalk@contesting .com is text only and always has been.  The only way around that is to post a link to some other site.

Dave   AB7E


On 4/15/2024 11:02 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
You can't?

73, Pete N4ZR


On 4/15/2024 1:29 PM, jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:15:49 -0400
From: Pete Smith N4ZR<pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
To:towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk difference?

<It strikes me as severely counterproductive to have two Towertalk
<reflectors.? I have been ontowertalk@contesting.com  for almost 30
<years, and find its archives invaluable.

<73, Pete N4ZR

Towertalk @ contesting.com is semi useless simply because you can't post
pix, files, video's, or anything else....major pita.  One pix is worth 1000
words.  Trying to describe any type of problem, configuration, or issue
with any type of tower / ant / rotor / switch box setup would be one
helluva lot easier with a pix or several pix.
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>