Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separate towers, take off angle

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] [CQ-Contest] Stacking on separate towers, take off angles?
From: Dan Maguire <djm2150@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Although this topic has been beaten into the ground I'd like to post a 
clarification.  Stan Stockton and I have exchanged a few private emails and I 
now see how I misinterpreted his remarks.

Stan proposed two towers separated by 1.5 WL.  He then suggested looking at the 
pattern when both antennas were rotated 45 deg off broadside.  Turns out he was 
thinking of *only* that particular rotation angle.  *My mistake* was making the 
assumption that he was interested in *all* rotation angles.

If the two towers are on a North-South line, with both antennas at 1.5 WL above 
real/average ground (which puts the TOA at 9 deg elevation) and the towers are 
separated by 1.5 WL, here's a comparison of the azimuth patterns at 9 deg 
elevation.  The blue trace shows both antennas facing East and the red trace 
shows both antennas facing NE.
http://ac6la.com/adhoc/TwoTower0vs45.gif

Stan was correct in asserting that the NE facing antennas produce a pattern 
which is comparable to the broadside pattern.  One might even say that the 
pattern is better.  The max gain is down by only an insignificant 0.20 dB and 
there is only a single large sidelobe.

To satisfy my own curiosity I then wanted to see what would happen if the 
spacing between the towers was changed.  In this animation the towers are still 
on a North-South line, both antennas are pointed NE, but the spacing between 
the towers is varied from 0.75 WL to 4.0 WL.  Look in the lower right corner to 
see the spacing (variable "S") in WL.  With most browsers you can use Esc to 
stop the animation and F5 to restart.
http://ac6la.com/adhoc/Pattern_vs_Spacing.gif

Another way to look at things is to plot the max gain vs the tower spacing.  In 
the first frame of the animation above the tower spacing is 0.75 WL (S = 0.75). 
 The outer ring  is frozen at 18.42 dBi and with S = 0.75 the max gain is down 
3.56 dB from the outer ring, or 14.86 dBi.  In the chart below, Max Gain vs 
Spacing, the first data point is for S = 0.75 and the dBi value is 14.86.  
Other data points show the max gain at different tower spacings.
http://ac6la.com/adhoc/Gain_vs_Spacing.gif

The S = 1.5 WL spacing is a good compromise between max gain and clean pattern. 
 I stand corrected.

Dan, AC6LA
http://ac6la.com/
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>