Hi Don and folk,
Knowing how bad the winds and rain can get on the Oregon coast I'd say this is
quiet a good recommendation for the Peet system Don has. Winds can easily get
to 60-70, sometimes even 90 at the worst of times and Don's place sounds like
it could catch some of the worst winds and salt spray. Awhile back I watched a
video on the PBS station from I think Cape Ago when some folks got the bright
idea to walk out onto an exposed headland where big wave were crashing. The
came near getting swept over the cliff with waves crashing up about 50-70 feet
over the rocks. Can get very ruff out there and the Oregon coast is known as
the graveyard of ships for a reason. Watch out for the following sea...
After getting intrigued about the La Crosse digital unit that came with my
house I tried to find any remote unit without success about 8" by 3", white,
etc. Just don't know but it still works after I replaced 3 AAA batteries in it.
Remote Time 92% RH (humity?) 28.8F to 36.3F; clouds and rain, Indoors date
2/28/2019 Thursday Dry 22-23% (humidity indoors) 77.F to 81.3F. Got to be
getting the info from some where. Does have an apparent Satellite dish by the
date and an antenna by the remote humity. Still got to wonder if it has some
kind of remote wind/temp/humid sensor. But I got to think Don has the real
serious station. Have fun Don.
Terry
KI7M
> On February 28, 2019 at 6:39 PM Don <w7wll@arrl.net> wrote:
>
>
> Peet is used by all of the amateur radio stations participating in
> thehttp://www.ocrg.org/telemetry_feed/ocrgwx.html
> <http://www.ocrg.org/telemetry_feed/ocrgwx.html>coastal weather
> reporting system here on the central and northerly OR coast. Reliable
> and *_repairable_* if needed. My Peet system has been in place since
> June of 2004. I'm just a few hundred feet off the ocean on an 70 foot
> high exposed hill with considerable winter winds. So far I've not
> experienced any loss of the TH7DX, the A3WS or 2 M antennas. Most
> problems have been with the reed switches in the vane units, but an easy
> fix.
>
> In my case I set up to meet (as best I could) the NOAA/NWS
> meteorological standards established for their weather sensors vs
> monitoring what the conditions were at the top of my tower. I agree
> that Davis is also a reliable system and will withstand the coastal
> rigors and there are a number installed at private residences along this
> part of the coast. At the time the OCRG system was established I
> understand Davis's SW was proprietary and not compatible with the
> systems as set up for the Peet units. It is now integrateable (is that a
> word?) I'm told.
>
> LaCrosse and Oregon Scientific units I've seen have in use down on this
> coast last aabout a 1 year at best under these salt air/water conditions
> we encounter, just corrode away. Perhaps inland they may fare better.
>
> Monitoring the wx is lots of fun. I also host AIS and ADS-B receiving
> stations which feed data back into the host systems. Something to watch
> when the bands are dead or near dead.
>
> Don W7WLL
>
> On 2/28/2019 4:45 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> > I'll second the recommendations for the Davis Vantage Pro2 and weewx.
> > The main complaint you hear about Davis is that it's expensive. That
> > includes the computer interface, which is extra. While I've heard good
> > things about Peet, most of the low-cost stuff gets a bad rap for
> > reliability. I'm on only my second Davis since I think 2002. Ask
> > people with Lacrosse and Ambient how many years they get out of each new
> > station.
> >
> > Do think about height for the wind sensor, and proximity to other
> > things. I see them mounted on towers, and I'm unclear on how much that
> > impacts measurments, so I should go read the setup guidelines.
> >
> > 73 de n1dam
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|