For information and a strength opinion- I posted recently about a tower in
10' sections that appears as 65G but has some differences. On initial
inspection this tower appeared identical to 65G except that the flanges were
0.5" thick (65G has 0.625" thick flanges), the flanges were rotated 45 degrees
from 65G orientation and the flanges were simply placed against bottom end of
leg and welded (65G flanges are punched out and slid over the legs, then welded
at top and small weld at bottom inside of flange). The flanges on this unknown
tower have a drain hole in center, some drain holes are about 5/8" and others
are about 7/8" roughly.
The unknown tower has the same 5/8" zig-zag bracing as 65G, same square
dimensions on flanges and same bolt sizes (4 of 5/8" size bolts per flange).
Upon closer inspection I found this unknown tower has 2.0" OD tubing for
legs (65G has 1.9" OD pipe). Both towers have a 0.15" wall thickness on legs. I
plan to install around 65' of this tower self-supporting using Rohn base plans
as called out for in their 65G self-supporting catalog. On the 10' section that
will be concreted in ground I went ahead and cut the flanges off so that I
could insure the legs sink down in sand bottom of hole to provide good
drainage. That allowed me to examine legs and measure wall thickness.
I found out that this unknown tower has a slightly larger triangle
dimension than 65G. I have a pair of 65G rotor shelves (that fit tightly in
65G) that are built similar to how the 45G/55G ones are, with a plate having a
pair of U-bolts to butt up against the tower leg. These shelves when installed
inside tower and centered have a 1/8" gap between vertical plates (for U-bolt
pair) and tower leg outside surface. I am making spacers to go in these gaps.
Even with larger diameter legs (2.0" on this tower versus 65G's 1.9") there are
1/8" gaps in rotor shelf fit. With a slightly larger leg diameter (2.0") and
the slightly larger triangle dimension I am curious if that gives this tower a
little bit more added strength versus if it was identical in spacings /leg size
as 65G? I realize that the 65G having thicker flanges and being that they are
punched out, slid over leg and welded in two places is a stronger design. I
just wanted to ask readers here that have mechanical knowledge how they feel
about this unknown tower as compared to 65G in my intended self-supporting use?
I am not going to load the tower excessively in my opinion, but somewhat
heavily as my plans are to put a 7 ele 6 meter LFA and a small 10/12 meter yagi
on it. I am making 3 new "spider" pieces to allow my 65G top bearing plate to
fit this tower; it has 3 pieces that bolt to central plate and go out to
flanges. Thanks for any evaluations/opinions on this.Byron W5FH
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|