The improvement in the matching system in the TH7 made is an excellent
antenna
The TH6 is very narrow by comparison.
I had a TH6 --- OK better than a wet noodle
converted to the TH7 -- Outstanding performer in the tri band class
easily on par with 34XA
K6EXO
----------
> From: Bob Perring <perring@infocom.net>
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: [TowerTalk] TH6 vs TH7 vs TA-36
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Date: Saturday, November 15, 1997 11:13 AM
>
> What would make one feel as though a TH7 might be a better antenna than
> a TH-6 ?
> Similarly, what would make one feel as though a TH-6 might be a better
> antenna than a TA-36?
>
> Boom lengths on all of these are pretty much the same.
> Element count is similar.
> Trapped vs. non-trapped element count is similar.
>
> I would appreciate some (broadcast to the group) responses to this
> question so as to generate some detailed responses to the posting.
>
> 73
> Bob
> N5RP
>
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
> Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|