Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160 antenna

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 antenna
From: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 06:08:04 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 05:42:52 -0400, Tom Rauch wrote:

>IMO the best solution is the suggestion to tie the
>feeder wires together and feed the antenna like a "T"
>against a good ground. 

This has worked for me. I don't have a big signal, but 
it works well enough that what I can work is limited as 
much by receive noise as by my transmitted signal. In my 
case, I don't have a "good ground," but I do have a 
reasonable counterpoise.  It loads pretty easily with a 
TenTec tuner (and no external capacitance). In fact, it 
works better than the same antenna loaded as a dipole on 
80 in directions that are off the end of the antenna. 

See

http://audiosystemsgroup.com/K9YC/k9yc160TopLoad.htm

and 

http://audiosystemsgroup.com/K9YC/Kraus-TopLoad.jpg

which is from Kraus. 

It is QUITE important that there be no choke balun in 
the usual place at the dipole center. The first time I 
tried this configuration, I burned up a conventional 
balun with 100 watts during the first contest weekend 
that I used it. The reasons should be obvious. 


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>