| To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] parallel dipole |
| From: | "Cam and Juli Hedrick" <walnutcreek@appstate.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:08:09 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
What is happening is that you have interaction between the two. Also, if the dipoles center is supported by the tower you first have interaction there that may have caused you to need the tuner. By putting in the electric dog fence that interaction was negated by a similar interaction. That's my two cents anyway. Cam WA4JKW _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] SECOND FLOOR SHACK, Tom Osborne |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Chrome-moly VS: steel, Mike Bragassa |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] parallel dipole, Merlin-7 KI4ILB |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Chrome-moly VS: steel, Mike Bragassa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |