Yep, that'll work. Appears you've figured it out and
others haven't.
van
wd8aam
At 23:25 4/26/2010, you wrote:
>Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>
> > > In regard to Joe Subich remarks below, a reflector is designed to
> > > SHARE information. Therefore a reply to originator setting in MY
> > > opinion defeats the purpose of information sharing.
>
> > A properly designed reflector will give the user the CHOICE of
> > "Reply to sender" and "Reply to All" or "Reply to List." This
> > software is so crippled by the moderator's configuration that
> > it is nearly impossible to reply to sender without using "new"
> > and looking up the poster's e-mail address.
>
>TODAY the behavior when hitting REPLY seems to be the same as REPLY ALL
>(gets sent to sender AND reflector). But REPLY ALL and then deleting the
>unwanted destination has always worked for me.
>
>-Steve K8LX
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|