Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Spanish-language conversation on baluns, antennas

To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Spanish-language conversation on baluns, antennas
From: van wd8aam <vlincoln@frontiernet.net>
Reply-to: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:29:26 +0000
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Yep, that'll work.  Appears you've figured it out and
others haven't.
van
wd8aam

At 23:25 4/26/2010, you wrote:
>Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>
> >  > In regard to Joe Subich remarks below, a reflector is designed to
> >  > SHARE information.  Therefore a reply to originator setting in MY
> >  > opinion defeats the purpose of information sharing.
>
> > A properly designed reflector will give the user the CHOICE of
> > "Reply to sender" and "Reply to All" or "Reply to List."  This
> > software is so crippled by the moderator's configuration that
> > it is nearly impossible to reply to sender without using "new"
> > and looking up the poster's e-mail address.
>
>TODAY the behavior when hitting REPLY seems to be the same as REPLY ALL
>(gets sent to sender AND reflector). But REPLY ALL and then deleting the
>unwanted destination has always worked for me.
>
>-Steve K8LX
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>