Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Regarding Worm Gear Drive Winches

To: Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Regarding Worm Gear Drive Winches
From: Dennis Vernacchia <n6ki73@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:18:02 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Just picked up a NEW Fulton KW3000 Worm Gear Style Winch today which I plan
to use with a 1/2 inch variable or low speed Drill  motor to tilt a
LM-470D tower that has around 1300 lBs dead weight on the cable when
tilting.

Anyone have any bad experience with this particular winch ?

Will it hold under load or tend to creep. I don't intend to not lock down
the
handle but good be good to know any anomalies with this setup


BTW they are on sale right now at Grainger for $143.( while supply lasts
whatever that means )

73, Dennis N6KI

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Dan Zimmerman N3OX <n3ox@n3ox.net> wrote:

> >
> > Depends on the particular worm gears (more specifically, the pitch of
> > the worm).  It's like whether you can backdrive a lead screw. Sometimes
> > you can, sometimes you can't.  The finer the pitch (= higher numerical
> > gear ratio) the more likely you can't backdrive.
> >
>
> You have to be a little careful too, even if it "appears" to be self
> locking.
>
> The mechanism that disallows back-driving is ultimately that the static
> friction becomes stronger and stronger under load when you try to
> backdrive,
> "locking" the thing in place.
>
> But if you have some vibration and a moderate load, just like any other
> frictional pinning, it might creep.
>
> And if it gets going, then you aren't looking at a static friction
> situation
> anymore, and it might not be *dynamically* self locking.
>
>  And as N2JFS says, it might be easier to backdrive over time.
>
> So I'd say don't rely on it.  And that's what worm gear drive manufacturers
> would say: don't rely on a self locking worm drive in place of a proper
> braking system in an application where it may be dangerous if it slips.
>
> 73
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>