Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar

To: Gregg Seidl <k9kl@centurytel.net>, TowerTalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Rebar
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:11:45 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

-----Original Message-----
>From: Gregg Seidl <k9kl@centurytel.net>
>Sent: May 29, 2008 12:33 PM
>To: TowerTalk@contesting.com
>Subject: [TowerTalk] Rebar
>
>Concrete will still CRACK with rebar in it but it won't seperate at the 
>crack.The rebar will hold it together.Gregg  K9KL 
>

There are various standards for the maximum crack size where you would declare 
that "failure" has occurred.

A quick google turns up a standard of 0.01" crack width for concrete pipe, 
which has been determined (by experiment and analysis) will not allow 
sufficient water and oxygen penetration to adversely affect the integrity of 
the reinforcing steel.

Obviously, if you have a concrete structure with a 1" crack that still holding 
together, it's basically failed (although, presumably in a failsafe or failsoft 
sort of manner).

Somewhere in between, you'll have a failed structure that is structurally OK 
today, but won't have the life or longevity in the future.  That's the 
situation where water infiltrates and causes corrosion of the rebar, then, 
perhaps lightning induced spalling.

Jim, W6RMK
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>