Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] ANTENNA HEIGHT

To: joe@wd0m.com, k2drn.cw@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] ANTENNA HEIGHT
From: Edward Sylvester <navydude1962@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:18:08 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
My opinion is that, at treetop level, you will be ok with a Steppir, as the 
take off angles will be high enough to miss the trees....But if you are well 
below (50' tower below 70' trees), you will signal will suffer some 
attenuation.  A quad won't suffer as much due to its closed circuit design.
   
  I have a Steppir, too but it's in the clear.  Best of luck.
   
  Ed NI6S

Joe <joe@wd0m.com> wrote:
  My 4L SteppIR is at treetop level - on a 55 foot tower. I've worked 307 
entities in about 4 years - SWR is flat across the bands, including 40, 
and 30M is about 1.5 or so to 1. A SteppIR will work wonders, and the 
tower height should of little impact.

Good luck!

-- 
Joe Hannigan - WDØM
Pagosa Springs, CO

http://www.WD0M.com
http://www.pagosarocks.com
http://www.quiltqueen.net




73

k2drn.cw@verizon.net wrote:
> i currently use a multiband 133' dipole for HF dx and want to go to a tower 
> with a 10 thru 30 meter yagi, maybe a steppir. My property is loaded with 
> ash trees approx 60 to 70 ft tall. will the trees be a problem if i choose 
> a tower not tall enough to put the antenna above them. I occasionally get 
> wind gusts up to 60 mph. all my interests are with HF dx. 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


       
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>