In a message dated 11/21/03 11:40:40 AM Eastern Standard Time,
W4EF@dellroy.com writes:
As usual, Yuri, presents a one-sided look at a two-sided
debate. He seems to think that science is done like politics
- smear your opponent and only tell one-side of the story.
Pathetic!
73 de Mike, W4EF............................
Why don't you mention what W5DXP came up as explanation for Tom's errors, why
don't you mention what W7EL measured and that it was what I predicted based
on available information and was right on - the 5% difference for the base
loading coil?
"One sided look" is based on real life measurements and reality. If that is
smearing, then I am proud of it.
I found on NG what I was looking for, confirmation and explanation what I
have observed and knew, and W9UCW measured, it will be summarized, explained in
a
more comprehensive article after I will complete the work. Then we will see
who is pathetic and who starts ridiculing those who do not agree with "guru's"
erroneous "teachings." Stand by.
How is that "proof" by Eznec using zero size coil? Go and MEASURE IT!
As usual, Yuri was right, when it didn't agree with Tom's "teachings" out
came the ridicule and name calling. Interesting that there is no backlash when
Tom does the name calling?
Yuri
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|