At 07:23 AM 12/21/1999 -0600, n4kg@juno.com wrote:
...
>130 ft C31XR
>100 ft 4L15
> 85 ft 3L20
> 70 ft 4L15
> 60 ft 6L10
> 40 ft C31XR
An interesting idea, but a question. Does this presuppose that the
monoband antennas in the stack would be sections out of the C-31 (i.e.
similar spacing)? I've always understood that stacking dissimilar antennas
is prone to unexpected downsides unless fully modeled.
73, Pete N4ZR
Don't forget to update your entry in the contest station database
http://206.102.70.3/search.htm
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|