MAERTZ, A REID wrote:
> Unless I'm totally out to lunch, I don't think David C's response was
> directed toward you or your question, but instead directed at the FIRST
> response to your question. (Check the posting again and the one word
> response). Heck, I thought it was a good question.
>
I, too, interpreted it this way, and thought it was a good
question. In general, I think there are few bad questions but
lots of answers that could have been better considered.
For example, those who insist so strongly on highly detailed
measureable non-anecdotal quantities frequently give highly
anecdotal answers themselves. I believe there are times
when anecdotal answers are valid in a non-digital world, as
there are times when we need to make allowance for
questions which are asked by the inexperienced.
Lyn, W4WDN
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|