Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Modeling

To: "jim@audiosystemsgroup.com" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>, "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Modeling
From: Dan Bookwalter via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: "N8DCJ@YAHOO.COM" <N8DCJ@YAHOO.COM>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:38:12 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Jim
Oh I fully understand,  but , I am not currently in a position to do that ... 
when I get back to a point where I can put up a real antenna(s),  I am sure I 
will ask these questions ...but , I still like just winging something in the 
air and letting er'rip so to speak... 
My opinion may be out dated , but , I still maintain we have lost some of 
that...
Dan

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Jim Brown<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:  
 On 7/11/2018 5:08 PM, Dan Bookwalter via TowerTalk wrote:
> I know everyone is onto modeling everything,  I am in the camp of , put it up 
> , give it a try , dont like it , try again ...
> We have lost so much of the "ham" part of ham radio... I used to , and still 
> do , throw a wire out and see what you can do ... other than 160 and probably 
> 80 , you can work a suprising amount of stuff ..

My view is completely the opposite -- to me, ham radio is studying the 
fundamentals and using that knowledge to build our stations, including 
antennas, that work better. Wandering around in the dark is not part of 
my view of ham radio.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
  
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>