Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] WTB: GAP VOYAGER and a ????

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] WTB: GAP VOYAGER and a ????
From: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 11:18:44 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
A Zero Five should work OK on 40, 30, and 20, and better if you have a 
remote tuner located at the base of the antenna.  With a remote tuner 
operation on 80 may also be acceptable.  Feedline loss without the 
remote tuner can be large.  Above 20 meters the take-off angle goes way 
up and the gain at useful low angles drops by a lot.  Here is some info 
on feedline and ground losses.
http://www.vk1od.net/multibandunloadedvertical/index.htm

Jerry, K4SAV

Daniel Hileman wrote:

>OK, I got it...I've heard REALLY good things about this Zero-Five 43' Vert, 
>and I think I'd be happier with that. I really appreciate all the help. Here's 
>the plan...43' Zero Five for DX (with 60 120' radials OH YEAH) , possibly an 
>inverted "L" for 160 DX/Ragchew...and maybe a few inverted V/bazookas 75m/40m 
>for stateside 300-1000miles out. I think that sounds like a plan for now.
>I have heard lots of opinions about the Voyager, and it seems "ok" but I think 
>for what I want 160-10m DX on a BUDGET) I'd be happier with the Zero-Five...OR 
>that DX engineering 43' Vert. 
> 
>Maybe later, I'll try a fullsize 75m 1/4 wave vertical suspended between 
>trees?? ;-)  
> 
> 
>Thanks and 73 Guys,
> 
>Daniel N9WX
> 
> 
>

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>