Perhaps we have to wait for "Part 2"?
I said it was "interesting"; I didn't say I understood it. ;-)
73,
Steve
EL98jh
Bill Aycock wrote:
> Is it just my ignorance, or does this "description" make no sense?I
> read it more than once, and tried to look up some words I did not
> recognize in the Wikipedia and the Wictionary. (I got MIMO, but
> meanderline escaped me) I have rarely seen a paper (Supposed to be
> Technical) that used more words and explained less than the one
> included as an example. There was one mystical equation and some
> figures, but nothing to say what was happening. There was one sketch
> of a device with labeled parts, but no explanation.
> WHEW! Help me.
> Bill-W4BSG
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Sacco NN4X"
> <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 12:28 PM
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Isolated Mode Antenna Technology
>
>
>> This seemed like an interesting concept. I thought I'd pass it along.
>>
>> Isolated Mode Antenna Technology lets a single antenna offer the
>> performance benefits of multiple antennas (Part 1 of 2)
>>
>> <http://www.rfdesignline.com/howto/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=F1SQHL23DOWTNQE1GHPCKHWATMY32JVN?articleID=222001586>
>>
>>
>>
>> 73,
>> Steve
>> NN4X
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|