Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Heliax Connectors

To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Heliax Connectors
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Reply-to: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:02:40 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

Ryan Jairam wrote:
> Unless someone is running at least 3x the legal limit, I doubt any
> amateur running legal amateur power levels will have any problem with
> either an N connector or PL259. Andrew N connectors can actually
> handle up to 10kW (peak) according to the spec sheets.
>
> High SWR may be a different issue but I try to avoid high SWR here.
> The only antennas I have that routinely operate under high SWR are fed
> with 450 ohm line.
>
> Anyway, my whole reason for using N was availability and cost.
> Performance is a non issue because under HF amateur applications at
> legal limit or less into a 50 ohm load there won't be any difference.
>   
I operate the full band on both 75 and 160. That means the SWR may hit 
8:1 which means very high voltages at times when running the legal 
limit.  I dislike open wire with a passion as every time some one runs 
it at FD it interferes like crazy. When running high power the stuff has 
to be well in the clear of everything and out of reach for safety. IOW 
it takes special handling and looks antiquated, if not messy. Now there 
is some real high voltage with 450 to 600 ohm open wire feed line.  The 
LMR-600 has very little loss even with the high SWR. I just need 
connectors that will handle it.  Steve found some nice ones for me, but 
I still take them apart and open up the one bulkhead behind the Teflon 
dielectric to get more clearance.  I use LMR-600 for a 160 feed line, 
pushing the legal limit. I've blown out N connectors on several 
occasions on 75 with less than the legal limit out of a two hole 76A. I 
even blew out a double female N connector. Man but that was hard to find 
as I didn't expect to find the problem there.  I'm now making my own 
current baluns as shown in K9YC's RFI tutorial.  They hold up, while the 
little $30-$40 baluns many places sell, do not hold up at all well.

I can operate the entire 40 meter band using an RG-8X, or CNT-240  feed 
line and N connectors and the legal limit,  from end to end, but not 160 
or 75. Also when running LMR-600 on 160 resistive losses are less of a 
concern although I don't think they amount to much in RG8 size cables at 
that frequency.  BTW I did not like CNT-240 because of the fragile 
braid. I need to get some LMR-240 and see if it's any better. I like the 
low profile cables to the sloping dipoles as they don't swing around so 
much or present the wind load of LMR-400. I've gone to using Davis 
BuryFlex as the leads to the 75 meter half wave, center fed slopers.

The next step on 75 is to go to 6" diameter cage, sloping dipoles. On 40 
I'm going to a beam.

N connectors are fine most of the time, but you have to make sure you 
have the proper ones/size for the cable you are using and that is some 
times a problem. Don't get the right size and they are not mechanically 
sound, or conversely you have a problem getting the nut washer and 
gasket over the jacket.

73

Roger (K8RI)
> Ryan, N2RJ
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Roger (K8RI) <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net> 
> wrote:
>   
>> Ryan Jairam wrote:
>>     
>>> I would just get N connectors and adapters and use that instead.
>>> Practically nobody else but ham and CB use UHF connectors anymore.
>>>
>>>       
>> To me the UHF are preferable to the N for HF if you run power and a high
>> SWR.  I look at N as a mistake.  If I didn't have so may connectors
>> already installed I'd go with the 7-16 DIN which might even be cheaper
>> now days.
>>
>> I've never noted any difference up through 2-meters although others
>> have. What we did different? I have no idea.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Roger (K8RI)
>>     
>>> Vy 73
>>> Ryan N2RJ
>>>
>>> On 4/20/10, john@kk9a.com <john@kk9a.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> These connectors are no longer made and most dealers seem to be out of 
>>>> them.
>>>> Here is one dealer that has four of them and is asking $1500/each
>>>> http://antennasystems.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=L44P&Category_Code=LDF4con
>>>> .
>>>> If anyone does have any L44P or L44U connectors that they would like to get
>>>> rid of for a more reasonable price, please send me a direct email
>>>>
>>>> John  john@kk9a.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Heliax Connectors
>>>> From: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
>>>> Reply-to: "Tower and HF antenna construction topics."
>>>> <towertalk@contesting.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:09:51 -0400
>>>> List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
>>>>
>>>> Steve Bagley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Ladies and Gentlemen:
>>>>> I have read so much information concerning what connectors to use for 1/2"
>>>>> heliax, I am thoroughly confused.
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to splice some heliax together for a long run, and terminate at the
>>>>> tower and shack.
>>>>>
>>>>> My arrestors are a standard SO-239 connector.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would prefer to use the connectors designed for the heliax vs standard
>>>>> 259's.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone have the appropriate part numbers and any concise input?  Really
>>>>> appreciate it!
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Assuming you're talking about Andrew LDF4, the Andrew part numbers are:
>>>>
>>>> L44Z - splice
>>>> L44P - UHF male
>>>> L44U - UHF female
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure any of these are actually made anymore, but can be found in
>>>> stock at some dealers, and commonly at fleamarkets. Also RF Industries
>>>> (RFI) makes a UHF male for LDF4 if I'm not mistaken.
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve Maki
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>