Dayle Johnson wrote:
> Larry....
>
>
>
>> Tubing is not pipe and that length of it with any substantial
>> weight, i.e. windload, is inviting disaster.
>
>
>
> Let me just say that pipe is not tubinig eighter. The terminology
> seems to be wrong here and is somehow being equated with strength....
>
>
>
>
> 1. Pipe is measured by the ID....inside diamater, no matter the
> material. Various scheduals will denote wall thicknesses.
Actually, all pipe of the same nominal size (e.g. 1") has the same OD,
which is almost never the nominal size (1" pipe is 1.315")
(think about plastic pipe, which has to slip fit into the same
fittings.. there's no such thing as a Sch 80 elbow)(iron pipe is
threaded and has to fit into standard threads..)
google for any pipe dimension table..
As you mentioned, the schedule tells you the (nominal) wall thickness.
But in any case, OD is the controlled dimension.
>
>
>
> 2. Tubing is measured by the OD...outside diamater, no matter the
> material.
>
>
>
> I would venture to say that a 2" aluminum tubing with a 1/2" wall
> would be more than what woud be needed...I don't know if you would
> like the cost.
>
>
>
> k0sz
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|