Usually people put the 40 above the tribanders because you want the
added height.
Which Trylon T-500 do you have? The T-500 64ft is actually 8 ft shorter
than claimed because of the 1 foot overlap of the tower legs. This from
Trylon: Tower height shown is nominal. Actual tower height is achieved
using the support pipe supplied with the tower.
58 ft is pretty low for a 40m antenna. I just checked the advertised
specs and the Cushcraft XM240 claimed gain is 6dbi while the M2 is 7.5
but weighs nearly 100 pounds more. Other than bandwidth I am not sure
what you are getting with the M2. If you convert the XM240 into a Moxon
you can even improve the performance.
I would probably not put the M2 on top either. I have a T500-64 and
there is quite a bit of give and flex at the top.
With linear loaded elements you are probably safe from major interaction
issues.
Good luck with your project.
W0MU
On 3/2/2011 7:58 PM, Michael W5NIG wrote:
> hey gang! I'm slowly recovering from some tower issues (bad storm,
> tower/antenna damage etc) and am rebuilding my tower stuff.
>
> Anyway have just finished getting my 64' T-500 Trylon freestanding tower
> back up properly with a couple of new sections.
>
> My previous setup was this:
>
> 24' mast, down about 8' or so (I think) in the tower to the rotator. Had a
> Force 12 5BA (20-10 including warc bands) mounted right above
> the thrust bearing.
>
> Had an M2 linear loaded 3 ele. 40m monobander about 8 to 10 ft above that
> and 5 or 6 foot above that some phased 2m beams.
>
> Had some issues with the 40m beam (operator error in some assembly) and got
> that fixed, but a MAJOR pain to get to since it was up on the stack.
>
>
> Anyway this time around I am just about to get the Force 12 5BA fixed up and
> have a M2 four element 40m monobander on order and would REALLY like
> to put it right above the thrust bearing for easy access just in case I have
> to fix any operator errors :)
>
> I don't think I've seen a 40 on bottom and multibander on top, usually the
> other way around. Anyone done it this way and any issues? (besides the
> obvious
> drop in height etc.)
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Michael de W5NIG
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|