Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower lawsuit

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower lawsuit
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:46:08 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

Doesn't anyone check out deed restrictions BEFORE buying a house  
anymore?   Putting up that kind of tower and antenna in the face of that 
deed restriction seems highly imprudent to me.

This particular deed restriction is certainly worded pretty poorly, and 
it may be possible to negate it by arguing that the description should 
refer to the structure itself and not the corollary equipment that feeds 
it, but even I as a tower owner would be hard pressed to agree that an 
amateur rig represents a "customary household appliance" since less than 
0.5% of all households in the U.S. have one.

Sorry if I don't sound very sympathetic, but it is actions like these 
that fuel neighborhood resistance toward the rest of us.

Dave   AB7E




On 2/2/2012 7:15 PM, Drax Felton wrote:
> I thought this might interest you all as tower owners.
>
> If anyone knows of other materials in my defense please forward them.
>
>
>
> This a letter I sent to the ARRL:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear ARRL,
>
>
>
> I would like to request the ARRL write a clarification letter on its
> letterhead to help me with an issue.
>
>
>
> My neighbors have served me with a civil summons regarding my antenna tower.
>
>
>
> We have a deed restriction that says that "no transmitting or receiving
> tower or antenna (other than those normally used for customary household
> radios and appliances) shall be permitted, and any satellite dish receivers
> must be located on the rear one-third of the lot."
>
>
>
> Since the crux of my defense is around what is "customary" to use at home I
> was hoping to get the ARRL, the national association for amateur radio, to
> document for evidence that it knows that ham radio has been a "customary
> household appliance" for around a 100 years.
>
>
>
> Their complaint also says that since I have an FCC license that makes my
> radios outside the normal custom of households too.  Clearly misinformed.
>
>
>
> They also complain that if my tower falls it will land on other properties,
> which is impossible on my 2.5 acre lot, given the distances to the property
> lines.  The tower we're talking about is a double guyed, 60 foot stack of
> Rohn 25 with a HF Yagi on it.  Not a superstructure.  Even if it could fall
> its entire length it wouldn't even hit my own house.
>
>
>
> I thank you for your help,
>
>
>
> ARRL Member, KB3X,  Drax Felton
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>