Your preferences are certainly reasonable, Steve, but I much prefer to climb
my skinny little 50' guyed Rohn 25 than my nested HDX-672 (sic). The crankup
has three demerits for climbing: The nested sections leave no room for your
feet. This particular tower is so big around that I can't get my climbing
belt lanyard around it. And even with the sections blocked against
accidental collapse, I still envision failure modes that could chop off a
finger or worse. The last time I had to climb my nested crankup, I used a
long extension ladder and felt much safer.
73,
/Rick N6XI
On 12/22/05, Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com> wrote:
>
> Extendable towers are slim and occupy less yard space yet remain
> highly serviceable and if you have to climb one, you don't have to climb
> very far (since you can only safely climb one when it's fully retracted
> anyway). As I get older, this is becoming a better feature.
>
>
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|