| To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] dipole z vs height |
| From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:48:15 -0800 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On 2/20/2013 5:29 PM, David J. Sourdis - HK1A wrote: Interesting. Is the take off angle the same for all three grounds when simulated at certain height? "Take-off angle" is normally used to describe the peak of the vertical pattern, but that pattern is broad. In general, better ground conductivity increases the strength of the pattern at lower angles. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] dipole z vs height, David J. Sourdis - HK1A |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] dipole z vs height, Jim Lux |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] dipole z vs height, David J. Sourdis - HK1A |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] dipole z vs height, Jim Lux |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |