Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] trap antenna performance

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] trap antenna performance
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:54:31 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 4/13/15 7:39 AM, Paul Christensen wrote:
"But traps are kind of difficult to model (at least in NEC) at a very
detailed level.  So maybe if the L or the C of the trap changes
significantly, then the trap resonance changes, which then changes the
apparent series L or C in the element.

Trap Q is more difficult to accurately model than it is to measure.  A few
measurements are worth a thousand words that talk about trap loss.


I was trying to build a fixture to measure traps on a 6BTV using a VNA, but it's a decidedly non-trivial proposition to de-embed the fixture. (where non-trivial means I couldn't figure it out over the weekend I was interested in doing it).


I believe Tom Rauch did some trap Q measurements and got "in the hundreds", so the loss effects, I suspect, are negligible.. that's why I'm thinking "detuning" of some sort.

http://www.w8ji.com/traps.htm


On a multiband dipole application, with the trap resonant frequency well between bands, it's probably not super critical..with a parallel resonant circuit below resonance it looks inductive and above resonance, it's capacitive, but the Z isn't changing too fast.

In a Yagi, though, where you're looking for specific amplitude and phase relationships, I can see it having a bigger effect.







"As Markku pointed out, the Q of the trap has to be fairly high, or they'd
melt from the losses."

And they do melt from loss.  During the 8th grade, I owned a TA-33 Jr.  When
I upgraded to the U.S. General Class license, I received a Heath SB-230 as a
birthday gift.  The moment I used the SB-230 on 20m with 500W, the driven
element traps melted.  I still remember calling Mosely about the issue and
their advice was to upgrade the DE to the MP-33 model.   The MP-33's DE
traps can better withstand loss.   I don't know whether or not the larger
traps withstand more power due to higher Q, or just that the larger diameter
coil and insulating material are just better at absorbing power before the
melting point occurs.  Back then, I was only interested in making contacts
and not understanding antenna theory.  The MP-33 worked fine, but then so
did a 15m Gotham 3L that was replaced by the TA-33 Jr.  The Gotham could
very well have been a better performer on 15m than the Mosely.

Paul;, W9AC




_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>