To: | john@kk9a.com, towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] FW: engineering help? Antenna weight for US Tower |
From: | "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Date: | Sat, 13 Jun 2015 17:01:35 -0700 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On 6/13/2015 3:40 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote: I do not see how extending or retracting the copper tape changes the balance point. The same weight is on the boom. John KK9A The issue with the large SteppIR's is that the boom is very flexible. The balance is an "unstable equilibrium", where the balance point is also the tipping point. Conventional mechanical concepts based on a rigid body are simply not applicable. Side guying the boom to an element helps the problem, but is not a panacea. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] FW: engineering help? Antenna weight for US Tower, john |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Force 12 180 B Dipole, Chuck Frame |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] FW: engineering help? Antenna weight for US Tower, john |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Force 12 180 B Dipole, Chuck Frame |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |