To: | "Towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [allowed] Re: [TowerTalk] Ground radials |
From: | Didier Juges <didier@cox.net> |
Date: | Wed, 24 Dec 2003 13:55:18 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I am not sure I would agree with that statement. The purpose of the ground
wire network is to reduce resistive losses in the ground. The wire has an
effect of reducing the resistivity of the ground under the antenna, on a
macro basis. If you use insulated wire, you loose the benefit of
conductivity between the wires and the soil, which overall will increase
resistivity compared to non-insulated wire. For instance, below is a wire (to the left) and 2 points in the ground (the X's, marked A and B)). With insulated wire, the resistance between A and B is purely driven by soil resistivity. With non-insulated wire, the current will jump from A to the wire, then travel through the wire up to the point closest to B, then jump to B through the soil. The overall resistance between A and B will be lower with non-insulated wire, so the losses should be less. | | | | X (A) | | | | | | X (B) | | | 73, Didier KO4BB At 07:37 PM 12/22/2003, Gene Smar wrote: Tom: _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Re: Locating Tower Guy Points, Didier Juges |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Locating Tower Guy Points, Jim Lux |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Ground radials, Jim Lux |
Next by Thread: | Re: [allowed] Re: [TowerTalk] Ground radials, Jim Lux |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |