RE: [TowerTalk] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please

[Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>]

At 11:16 AM 6/21/2004, Keith Dutson wrote:
> Stacking LPAs is rare to my knowledge.  The problem is in planning how far
> to separate them.  For best 20-15-10 performance the distance should be
> about 33 feet.  But this will not work well for 17 and 12, so you will get
> better performance working each antenna separately (unphased) on these
> bands.


I agree that the LPDA is not the right solution -- it is designed for 
acceptable swr and gain over a wide, continuous frequency range, at the 
cost of gain and F/B in the ham bands, weight and wind area.  However, if 
you chose to go that route, I think that modeling can answer the question 
about stack spacing.

I have not modeled an LPDA stack, but short-boom tribanders generally 
require closer spacing than those with longer booms and/or more elements. 
Given conditions for the next few years, I would go for compromise spacing 
that prioritizes among 20, 17 and then 15 meters, letting 12 and 10 fare 
for themselves.  Modeling might also disclose spacing that truly optimizes 
for one band -- for example my 2-high C-3E stack is currently at 28 feet 
spacing, but modeling shows that if you focus on 20 meters, spacing of 36 
feet is a real sweet spot, yielding excellent gain and F/B ratio much 
better than either antenna separately.  I may be moving my bottom antenna 
down in a year or so, just for that reason.

73, Pete N4ZR
The World HF Contest Station Database
was updated on June 5, 2004
2728 contest stations at
www.pvrc.org/WCSD/WCSDsearch.htm  

_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk