At 02:36 PM 3/18/2005, j4976@juno.com wrote:
>I thought that the point of a lightning rod or similar device was that a
>house being a poor conductor, if hit, gets hit by a huge charge. By
>putting up a lightning rod which is a good conductor with a good path to
>ground, the lightning can discharge earlier as a smaller charge, and
>hopefully do less damage.
Nope.. the idea is to conduct the huge current to the ground by means of
something that won't explode, spall, burst into flames, or kill
someone. They are basically a fire prevention mechanism. The amount of
charge is probably totally unaffected by the presence or absence of a
lightning rod (especially since that lightning rod is a tiny little pimple
in the context of the charged area of the thunderstorm responsible for the
flash.. some km in diameter)
>On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:20:48 -0500 "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>
>writes:
> >
> > EWR 10 years ago. Once our hearing recovered from the thunder
> > clap, Cap'n came on the intercom and said, Folks,
> > that surely was exciting, but it was only a static discharge,
> > we weren't hit by lightning, not to worry...
That's "spin", like the "freak vortex wind phenomenon" that touched down
inside Disneyland (in Anaheim, CA) a few years ago. Nope.. no tornadoes at
the happiest place on earth, nosiree, can't happen, won't allow it.
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|