Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:25:33 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Do you have a choke on the rotator and antenna relay cables? Is there a
benefit to choking these cables also?

John KK9A


To:     <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject:        [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K
From:   "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2016 06:43:11 -0700


Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:48:35 -0400
From: <john@kk9a.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] CMC-230-5K


If you have a good choke at the antenna and good coax, is there a reason for
having another choke inside the shack?

John KK9A

##  I know of several folks who had real bad RFI /TVI /DSL/phone issues,
and no
amount of
filtering the affected devices helped much.  In desperation, CMC right at the
output of the linear
amp solved the problem...go figure.   Some had good baluns at the ants..and
some had lousy baluns.
IMO, whats really required is sjy high Z /RS..right at the feedpoint.  Then
supplement with more CMCs
downstream..if required.

Jim  VE7RF


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>