Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] HyGain And Cushcraft

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] HyGain And Cushcraft
From: Jim Brown via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 23:15:37 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 4/14/2026 10:11 PM, David Gilbert via TowerTalk wrote:
Hy-Gain or Cushcraft antenna anymore when there are more modern designs available?

Both companies made center-fed loaded multi-band HF dipoles that tests by N0AX and K7LXC c. a. 2001 showed to be excellent performers. They do not require radials. Their tests were done with all antennas mounted at ground level.

About ten years ago, I published an extensive modeling study showing that performance of these antennas benefits from being mounted on the non-conductive roof of typical residential homes. The improvement is for two reasons -- reduced coupling to lossy earth under the antenna, and lowering the vertical lobe by the increased height the antenna's current maxima.

Old hands here can probably tell us who did those two designs. They were the AV-series and R-series.

http://k9yc.com/VerticalHeight.pdf
Slides for talks at Pacificon and Visalia

http://k9yc.com/AntennaPlanning.pdf
Text version for NCJ, which was prepared by the editor but which ARRL's graphics department decided was too much work. It included a companion study on the height of horizontally polarized dipoles.

73, Jim K9YC





_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>