Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Another way to make a CM choke ?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Another way to make a CM choke ?
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:37:50 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 20:26:16 -0800
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Another way to make a CM choke ?

<And not a very good one, because it fails to consider the common mode 
<circuit of which it is a part.

<73, Jim K9YC

<On 12/14/2017 1:48 PM, David Robbins wrote:
> Ancient reference for aircore 
> baluns:http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/airbalun.html
>

##  The chart goes from 1 mhz  up to 30 mhz,  in 1 mhz increments.  As noted he 
did
NOT depict the exact freq of resonance.   But the concept works, with extreme 
high Zs
and all resistive, when at exact resonance.  Albeit, they are narrow banded 
devices, as can
be seen when going just plus or minus 1 mhz !   To tweak these correctly, they 
would have to 
be shifted in freq, by adding or subtracting turns, which of course adds or 
subtracts both uh
and C.    It would take some mucking about, but ideally, one could get the 
resonance point
either inside a ham band, or just above a ham band.  If just above a ham band, 
then a small
amount of external C between  input  and output braids  would lower the 
resonance... low
enough to fine tune it to the band of interest. 

##  But for 160-80-40m, it will use one helluva lot of coax, to even get close 
to working with a 
high Z,  so its impractical for the lower bands, and marginal for the upper 
bands.   Final verification
could easily be done with any clamp on RF ammeter. 

Jim   VE7RF   

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>