Very true, and that's essentially what N6BT's ZR antennas were.
In general, of course, the feedpoint impedance goes down for a shortened
antenna, which typically means the feedpoint efficiency suffers, and the
bandwidth gets a lot narrower.
If you can effectively get the power to a shortened antenna the radiated
energy is not a lot different than for a full sized antenna, either for
magnitude or pattern. I just modeled a 25 foot vertical dipole for 80m
with the bottom two feet off the ground. The main lobe is 0.77 dbi at 27
degrees which is almost identical to a full half wavelength vertical
dipole, but the feedpoint impedance is 3 - j3000. That's going to be
really hard to match without a ton of loss. TLW's tuner calculator says
that an L-Network with an inductor Q of 200 and a capacitor Q of 1000
would have over 10 dB of loss and result in a 6 KHz bandwidth. Even an
inductor Q of 400 is going to dissipate 1,000 watts in the inductor with
full legal power feeding it, so I suspect such an antenna would be
limited to more like 100 watts input.
73,
Dave AB7E
On 10/20/2020 1:21 PM, jimlux wrote:
On 10/20/20 1:01 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
Electrically, a half wave vertical dipole is not a lot different than
a quarter wave vertical fed against radials or a counterpoise, but it
requires a LOT more height to put it up. I just modeled two
different antennas in EZNEC+ as a comparison (both over medium ground):
A lot of these antennas are an electrically short dipole. so they
don't require the height. From a gain standpoint, an infinitesimally
small dipole is 1.5 dBi and a full size dipole is 2.5 dBi (mostly from
the broader lobe for the short antenna).
What might be interesting is modeling, say, a 25 foot dipole with the
center 13-14 feet off the ground.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|