A few years ago, in a different context, the question of holes as
stress risers and centers of fatigue failure was raised. Since then,
I've seen a reference to the idea that a filled hole has much less
susceptibility to fatigue than an empty hole. This reference was
regarding riveting of aircraft skins.
It makes sense that a filled hole can't deform inward, so the idea of
filling tower-leg holes with a nutted bolt seems a good one. The filler,
whether it's a bolt in a large hole or a rivet in a smaller one, should
be a tight fit or the effect is lost.
Re Rohn 45, I prefer the flat top sections that bolt onto a standard
section. Besides giving a place to stand and work (assuming the mast
you're strapped to is trustworthy!), it's a more flexible logistics
situation. The thick-wall sleeves on the top plate reduce the chance
of fatigue failure at the bolt holes, which in any event are filled by
the bolts.
Cheers de Dave, W6NL (ex-QHS)
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
|