Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Reduced size receiving antennas

To: "'K3VX'" <k3vx@verizon.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Reduced size receiving antennas
From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:23:22 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I use the 4sq rcv array from DX Engineering and they work great.  They use
shortened whips for the verticals.  I do not have a full sized 4sq to
compare.

I have used other small loops in the past.  What I have found is something
is usually better than nothing.

Mike W0MU 


CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1
W0MU.NET or  67.40.148.194

"A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may
never get over." Ben Franklin 



-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K3VX
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:19 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Reduced size receiving antennas


TTers,

Has anyone built a reduced size version of the K9AY terminated loop(s)?

 If so what are the consequences (besides the obvious reduction in capture
area).

Same question for pennants and flags.

The reason for the question is a very long and skinny  backyard.

TIA and 73

Larry K3VX
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>