Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground

To: n6kj@yahoo.com, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground
From: "Pat Barthelow" <aa6eg@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:49:24 -0800
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Kelly, and TT:

One reason for the desirability of broad, flat ground conductors at RF, is that the series inductance of such is much less than "round" conductors of any manageable size... While a narrow stricture somewhere in the conductor should be avoided if possible, and it is difficult to avoid entirely, you still gain benefits from the broad conductor contributing less total inductance to the ground system....even if in series with a small run of narrow conductor...

73, DX, de Pat AA6EG aa6eg@hotmail.com


OK, I've gotten several responses to my station
ground question.  Nearly all of them have described
a ground system with "beefy" (#0 or #2 stranded)
wire connecting a bus-bar in the shack to a
ground rod (or multiple ground rods connected
together), but all of them have described how they
connect the rig to the bus-bar using much smaller
(like #10) wire.  Isn't this a "weakest link problem"?
Why do you need "beefy" connections from bus-bar
to ground when you use much smaller wire
connecting the equipment to the bus-bar?
.
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>