Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR

To: Tower Talk <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Change in SWR
From: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:51:14 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Not sure what your hangup is about Mosley (if you 'dis it, at least spell
the name right),
but saying in general that they have less gain than a dipole is really
stretching your
credibility.

I had a PRO-57A for many years and I can attest it worked better than a
dipole. But,
so far, all I read is talk, with no facts presented to support your
comment.

73, Dick, W1KSZ


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:

> On 12/3/2013 8:29 AM, Doug Scribner wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the responses...
>>
>
> Before investing any more time and money in the Moseley, I STRONGLY
> suggest that you buy and study the report by N0AX and K7LXC on a dozen or
> so tri-banders, including two Moseleys. The executive summary is that they
> were VERY poor performers -- like less gain than a dipole at the same
> location and height, and over the same path. Order the report from K7LXC's
> website.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>