This does little good in this case however. He's up against CC&R's which
are private land use agreements and not pre-empted but this or the Federal
PRB-1 statute.
There's only a few of these that are pre-empted which is thing covered
under OTARDS, restrictions on selling due to the race of the buyer, etc.
Chuck
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Rick Mainhart <mainhart@triad.rr.com>wrote:
> Drax,
>
> You may wish to take a look at the following:
>
>
> http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2007/Bills/House/PDF/H1340v0.pdf
>
>
> A friend of mine recently convinced the city of High Point that their
> 70' restriction was violating state law, and they agreed to follow the
> state law. I believe "reasonable accommodation" may apply here.
>
> 73,
>
> Rick
> NM3G
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|