Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] AN vs trylon... eng report

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] AN vs trylon... eng report
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 14:27:59 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
http://www.anwireless.com/tower.html

scroll way down till  u see...  Design Comparison - AN Wireless Tower and the 
Trylon Titan Tower - Performed by TEP, Inc.

Then click on.....  PDF Version of Design Comparison Report  3.6 MB

Read it....then tell us the trylon is even in the same ballgame.   And the 
trylon cost MORE than the AN wireless. 
This is the end of this argument, cuz their isnt one.   Well actually there is. 
  The comparison is between the
Trylon T-400...80 ft tower, whose top section is a #4...  which is only 15 
inchs at the top of that section..and 18 inchs
across at the bottom of the same  section #4.   The Peng compared the trylon #4 
  to the AN  section #7.      And both are supposed
to be the very top section of each makers respective  heaviest duty 80 ft 
tower.   Note, trylon numbers their sections  from top to bottom....and 
AN does just the opposite...  bottom to top.    

Well, somebody screwed up, cuz   AN  makes 3 version of their 80 ft tower, 
using sections 1-8 for the HDD version. Sections  3-10  for their
HD version......and  sections 5-12  for their LD version.  The Peng shoulda 
been using the AN section # 8  for the comparison, not the  even stronger 
/bigger
section #7..which skewed the results even more.    

Jim   VE7RF

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TowerTalk] AN vs trylon... eng report, Jim Thomson <=