To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Why are elements mounted on top of boom? |
From: | alsopb@vance.net (alsopb@vance.net) |
Date: | Sat, 17 May 1997 15:05:44 -0500 |
Guys, A question: Why are yagi elements mounted on top of the boom, perched precariously on a mountain, rather than slung underneath? It seems to me mounting them underneath would be less prone to element rotation. Also, it seems to me it would also reduce the tendency for the boom to rotate at the boom/mast point? de Brian/K3KO Vance Net Inc End Of Message -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Re: [DX] New HF beam product announcement, JOE.BETTE-BENNETT@ITU.CH |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Why are elements mounted on top of boom?, Charlie Summers |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Why are elements mounted on top of boom?, Charlie Summers |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Why are elements mounted on top of boom?, Stan Griffiths |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |