Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Combined Dipoles

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Combined Dipoles
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:23:22 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:43:26 -0700, Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
wrote:

>BTW, after some hours of grinding the optimizer in 4nec2 I've not been 
>able to find a set of lengths for 3-5 parallel dipoles that provides a 
>good match on ALL HF hambands without a tuner. 

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Good point. I should have mentioned my parallel vees easily tune to 30,
17 and 12 meters with a tuner. My tuner is a homebrew T-match using two
1000 pF vacuum variables and a 20 uH roller inductor, with turns
counters on all three elements. Works like a charm. I use it mostly on
80 meters where the minimum SWR is 1.5:1 without it, or on the other
bands when I get far off resonance. On 160 and 40 I was able to trim the
vees to a perfect 1:1 without the tuner.

If anyone is considering building such a tuner, a 10 uH inductor would
be more than enough. The max inductance I need on any band, including
160 meters, is about 7-8 uH. Remember, this is for coax-fed vees or
dipoles only. If you are planning on balanced lines, you might need more
range of inductance. 

73, Bill W6WRT



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>