Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Roswell Tower Accident/double lanyard

To: "'TowerTalk'" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Roswell Tower Accident/double lanyard
From: "David Calder" <n4zkf@n4zkf.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:47:30 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 
ALL my towers have this steel line running up it to use. If we have one
without a safety climb, I tell them to let me know and I get one installed.



-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kelly Johnson
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:39 AM
To: TowerTalk
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Roswell Tower Accident/double lanyard

I'm surprised that few people mentioned the use of a permanently mounted
climbing rope (or whatever you call it).  Don't some commercial towers have
something like this with a mechanism on it that won't let you slide quickly
down the rope?  Is this just too uneconomical for hams?


On 10/25/07, Jay Schwisow <jay@kt5e.us> wrote:
> Kelly and all,
>
> I work with a double "twin leg" shock absorbing lanyard.  These come 
> in a variety of sizes but mine has 2" throat openings so I can easily
> operate with one hand and get them on a leg of the tower.     This way I
> am always connected to the tower.  Once I get where I need to work I 
> have another smaller positioning lanyard to keep me close in.
>
> You can see this and others at www.tessco.com   Elk River 35416.  This
> one is $300.00 but there are others with smaller openings for less 
> ($150 or so).  I urge all not to get in a hurry  with this sort of 
> rig.  It takes a bit longer to go up and down a tower this way but 
> there is a lot of added safety.
>
> Jay - KT5E
>
> Kelly Johnson wrote:
> > My climbing experience is limited to heights of about 30 feet or so, 
> > but regardless I'd like to understand the proper way of climbing up 
> > a tower while remaining connected at all times.  When people start 
> > their climb at the ground, how do they attach to the tower while
climbing?
> > Do they have a safety cable permanently mounted to the tower or do 
> > they clip a cable as high as they can reach, climb beyond it, clip 
> > another as high as they can reach, and so forth or what?
> >
> > On 10/24/07, Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net> wrote:
> >
> >> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:08:48 +0000, n7ka@comcast.net wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> AT NO TIME SHOULD WE NOT BE ATTACHED SECURELY TO THE TOWER.
> >>>
> >> ------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
> >>
> >> I know you are right, but I have seen tower climbing professionals 
> >> who climb a tower with no safety line connected at all, and only 
> >> hook up when they are in place ready to work.
> >>
> >> If the professionals are so lacking in concern, what hope is there 
> >> for us amateurs? I guess after you climb a few hundred towers with 
> >> no accidents, you become immortal.
> >>
> >> My rule is to always have two connections to the tower: Either my 
> >> safety line plus one hand, or two safety lines. I never trust only 
> >> one safety connection, ever.
> >>
> >> 73, Bill W6WRT
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> TowerTalk mailing list
> >> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>