VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 vs FT4

To: "vhfcontesting@contesting.com" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 vs FT4
From: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Buddy Morgan <beamar@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 01:31:48 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
 I made a few FT4 contacts.  There were times that 50.313 looked like 20M. The 
FT4 frequency was much less crowded. I made one contact on 50.323 - the 
alternate 6M FT8 frequency. When the waterfall is one mass of red, you would 
think that people would look elsewhere?
Buddy WB4OMG
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Herb Krumich via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
To: VHF <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Sent: Mon, Jun 13, 2022 8:17 pm
Subject: [VHFcontesting] FT8 vs FT4

Last evening in the contest I was amazed to see how many ops had switched to 
FT4I ran stations for 3 hoursSo tonight I'm listening on 313 and it's 
packedNothing on the FT4 freqWhen will people start using a speed mode vs a 
snail mode73Herb K2LNS
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>