Hi, John, and everyone else,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 07:55:09 -0800 (PST)
John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com> wrote:
Very interesting discussion...
> I agree that the Icom IC970H is considered the top of
> the line VHF/UHF rig, and I believe that it is, and it
> still commands a very good price. The one shortcoming
> with it is that it is a satellite rig-that means that
> it has no 6 meters,
I believe Icom assumes that if you have an IC-970H you will also have
one of their high end HF rigs, all of which have 6 meters. Considering
what the IC-575H is going for on the used market nowadays, having one
additional rig (instead of a shack in a box) doesn't seem like such a
bad thing to me.
> no 220
Icom has long abandoned the 222MHz band. It isn't a ham band in Japan
and Europe, and even in the U.S. demand was minimal. Take a look how
many FT-736Rs have the 222 module compared to the total number out
there. Take a look at how many IC-375As they managed to sell. I think
this was, more than anything, a marketing decision. They certainly
could have made a 222 module for the rig.
> and the 2.4 module is for
> the wrong part of the 13cm band.
Not in Japan, it's not. Their band is much smaller than ours. Was the
13cm module even sold in the US? I don't think so.
> That seems to be
> Icom's dirction today-make all of their VHF rigs
> geared only to satellite users.
Not exactly. I think they are geared to the Japanese market, not the
U.S. market.
> Yaesu is doing the
> same thing.
Yep.
> The beauty of the FT736 was that it was a
> satellite rig that was also geared towards terrestrial
> operation-hence the 220 and 6 modules.
It also had a mediocre receiver. The FT-736R was simply the best
all-in-one budget solution. Serious VHF/UHFers prefer transverters for
good reason: they outperform the FT-736R in almost every way. Ditto
the FT-847. The IC-970H and IC-x75 series realy could hold their own,
performance-wise. Pity there isn't the demand in the U.S. for the
IC-970H or an updated version.
73,
Caity
KU4QD
>
> I am curious as to why there is this satellite focus.
> Surely there must be more hams doing terrestrial work
> than satellite work
>
> 73s John NE0P
>
>
> --- caitlynmaire@earthlink.net wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The closest thing today would be the Icom IC-970J,
> > the Japanese version
> > of the IC-970H, which is still sold in Japan. We
> > Americans wouldn't pay
> > the big bucks so it was discontinued here. No 6m,
> > but a fabulous
> > 2m/70cm/23cm rig. I got to play with one and
> > decided that if I ever won
> > the lottery... Every time I see an IC-970H with the
> > 23cm module it
> > *still* goes for a lot of green.
> >
> > 73,
> > Caity
> > KU4QD
> > ------
> > Submissions:
> > vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu
> > Subscription/removal requests:
> > vhf-request@w6yx.stanford.edu
> > Human list administrator:
> > vhf-approval@w6yx.stanford.edu
> > List rules and information:
> http://www-w6yx.stanford.edu/vhf/
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> ------
> Submissions: vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu
> Subscription/removal requests: vhf-request@w6yx.stanford.edu
> Human list administrator: vhf-approval@w6yx.stanford.edu
> List rules and information: http://www-w6yx.stanford.edu/vhf/
|