VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 vs FT4

To: "'VHF Contesting Reflector'" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 vs FT4
From: "Tom Holmes" <tholmes@woh.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 21:07:49 -0400
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Possibly due the presence of many EU stations on the FT8 segment Sunday 
afternoon?

Tom Holmes, N8ZM

-----Original Message-----
From: VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting-bounces+tholmes=woh.rr.com@contesting.com> 
On Behalf Of alex@kr1st.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2022 8:47 PM
To: Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
Cc: VHF Contesting Reflector <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 vs FT4

I just checked my 2020 log and found that I worked 179 Q's on FT4 
compared to "only" 92 this time around. I'm not sure what the 
significance of that is though. It's just a single data point.

73,
--Alex KR1ST

On 2022-06-14 19:30, Ed K1EP wrote:
> I found .313 rather crowded at times. I saw some activity on .323, but 
> I
> did try FT4. I was surprised at how much activity there was there 
> compared
> to previous contests. I think I had about 100Qs on FT4 with some DX 
> too.
> 
> reply to: K1EP@arrl.net
> 
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting


_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>