WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[WriteLog] Re: 2001 CQ/RJ RTTY WPX UBNs.

To: <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: [WriteLog] Re: 2001 CQ/RJ RTTY WPX UBNs.
From: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:44:21 -0500
Isn't this why we ask for so many repeats?  If it doesn't matter what we put
in our logs, why not just make up a time or other exchange?  I'm just trying
to learn here...

----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Spencer <ronspencer@nc.rr.com>
To: WA9ALS - John <wa9als@starband.net>; <writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Re: 2001 CQ/RJ RTTY WPX UBNs.


> I disagree. when I contest I am responsible for my log and not someone
> else's. I should only be held responsible for my log and not penalized for
> someone else's mistakes over which I have no control.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Ron Spencer
> N4XD
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "WA9ALS - John" <wa9als@starband.net>
> To: <writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Re: 2001 CQ/RJ RTTY WPX UBNs.
>
>
> >
> > > The penalty belongs to the other fellow. Unless you want to hold AD1C
> > > responsible for the correct logging of every single person he worked.
> >
> > Isn't this why we work DUPES again, even if they're in OUR log?  I think
> > we -DO- depend on being properly logged in the other stations' logs.
This
> > is just one reason to be careful/sensible about how your macros are
setup,
> > why you should have a callsign that's not prone to errors whether
> > CW/phone/RTTY, why you shouldn't have a callsign -almost- like someone
> > elses, etc, etc........



--
WWW:                      http://www.writelog.com/
Submissions:              writelog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>