To: | Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>, writelog@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [WriteLog] What's wrong with AFSK? was - 5 bit mystery unraveled |
From: | Jerry Pixton <jpixton@shentel.net> |
Date: | Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:17:38 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:writelog@contesting.com> |
Jim, The post this morning is just one reason in favor of FSK. No audio feedback. A second is that often the Mike Gain control is right next to the Audio Gain controls. I have probably turned down the Mike Gain a thousand times when I was reaching blindly for the Audio Gain control. Third you don't have to work about the ALC levels adjustment as you change things on the sound board. Just several examples of why FSK is easier. On the downside, you have to use standard tones. Jerry, W6IHG With one radio still using FSK and one now that I had to switch to AFSK At 11:47 PM 2/29/2004 -0800, Jim Smith wrote: It seems to me that the cognoscenti prefer FSK to AFSK. I have never seen any reasons for this preference, probably because I haven't looked in the right place. So, what's the problem with just sending AFSK to the radio, thereby eliminating the need for an AFSK to FSK converter?
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [WriteLog] What's wrong with AFSK? was - 5 bit mystery unraveled, WA9ALS - John |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [WriteLog] Feedback?, Jerry Pixton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [WriteLog] What's wrong with AFSK? was - 5 bit mystery unraveled, WA9ALS - John |
Next by Thread: | RE: [WriteLog] What's wrong with AFSK? was - 5 bit mysteryunraveled, Mike McCarthy, W1NR |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |