I am not by any means an expert on this as I only do SO2R and have done
just one M2 in the early days before much of the current strategy was
formulated with multiple rigs per station.
I believe the rules require you to have a hardware lockout. In my case my
SO2R controller ensures that the two transmitters are never on air at the
same time.
With regard to M2 and the other MS and even MM the evolving strategies may
make it difficult for software solutions. When I add a third rig I know
WriteLog will support it BUT I will have to ensure that it is not on air
with any other transmitters etc. I couldn't expect WriteLog to mirror my
strategy of using 3 or 4 rigs.
So I do think that the issues of rig lockouts should be addressed in
hardware because the rules require that.
Just my 2 cents.
H
Regards Dean 8P2K
Dean St. Hill
Barbados.JustAskLocals.com
It's a big world. Travel smarter.
246-416-5277
246-825-2039 (mobile)
sent from my BLU smartphone
On Jun 16, 2016 2:16 AM, "Kostas SV1DPI" <sv1dpi@otenet.gr> wrote:
> On 15/6/2016 5:16 μμ, Stein-Roar Brobakken wrote:
>
>> Possible add 1-2 Support/Mult station
>>
> I think that the point is to define what station you have and you can
> change it. For example I have run1 as nr1 in the radio column and run2 as
> nr2. If I could define the rest of the stations to be either nr1 or nr2 and
> not nr3, nr4, etc. plus to have the interlock works *only *with the same
> number station, should be ok for M2.
>
> 73 Kostas SV1DPI
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
>
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
|