Yaesu
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Yaesu] Progress and internal tuners

To: "'WA3GIN @ Arlington County, VA'" <wa3gin@erols.com>,"'John Geiger'" <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Yaesu] Progress and internal tuners
From: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:33:20 -0500
List-post: <mailto:yaesu@contesting.com>
Actually I think it is more like profit was headed in the gutter and
something had to be done to turn this around.  Plus, few are willing to pay
for a tuner that does more than advertised.

73, Keith NM5G 

-----Original Message-----
From: yaesu-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:yaesu-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of WA3GIN @ Arlington County, VA
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:29 PM
To: John Geiger
Cc: yaesu@mailman.qth.net; icom@mailman.qth.net; yaesu@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Yaesu] Progress and internal tuners

less copper and caps = more profit...

John Geiger wrote:

>Many of the older radios with internal antenna tuners (TS440, FT890, 
>FT900) had great internal tuners that would match almost any coax fed 
>antennas.  Most of the current models have internal tuners that are 
>pretty poor by comparison, as they won't do much if your SWR is over 
>3:1.  So, with 10 plus years of progress, we get internal tuners that 
>are worse than before.
>
>Anyone have an idea as to what is going on here?
>
>73s John W5TD
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________
>Yaesu mailing list
>Yaesu@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/yaesu
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Yaesu mailing list
Yaesu@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/yaesu

_______________________________________________
Yaesu mailing list
Yaesu@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/yaesu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>