Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Gudguyham@aol.com: 815 ]

Total 815 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [Amps] Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:24:13 EST
It doesn't matter which wire you use as hot and which one is switched when connected to a switch. I have a wiring book that has two different examples. One way white is hot to the switch and the othe
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00248.html (9,255 bytes)

102. Re: [Amps] Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:27:36 EST
Mike, Although it's not mandatory, it a real good thing to do. When I worked as an industrial electrician, a lot of times we had to work on live circuits as the main just could not be shut off over s
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00250.html (8,859 bytes)

103. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:27:10 EST
However, if a neutral is in place, and it is bonded to the cabinet, in the rare event that the safety-ground is severed, the cabinet could not possibly become a shock hazard. If it is bonded to the c
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00256.html (7,426 bytes)

104. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:31:53 EST
The wiring manual I use states the following: A) A 120/240-volt, 30 amp receptacle (4 wires); connect the white wire to the white receptacle terminal. Connect the red and black cable wires to recepta
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00257.html (8,695 bytes)

105. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:37:26 EST
Perhaps 120VAC devices were more prevalent then or the tap arrangement was too complex? Recent amps designed for use with either 120VAC or 240VAC do not appear to share this issue. Anyone know what t
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00272.html (9,710 bytes)

106. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:40:58 EST
I still maintain the existing NEC code allowing use of a neutral is an attempt to placate some powerful special interests in the electrical industry. It is NOT the safest approach to the issue. 73, B
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00273.html (9,497 bytes)

107. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:53:51 EST
And, it also allows the equipment to work in foreign countries with two wire 240v -0 or three wire 240v -0 -0 service. 73/k5gw Good Point _______________________________________________ Amps mailing
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00276.html (8,507 bytes)

108. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:02:55 EST
Maybe the NEC is run by the same type of folks. John w4kv ________________________________ If anyone would like the address to where you can write the NEC for a code change or ammendment, I would be
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00277.html (9,394 bytes)

109. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:58:20 EST
You mean the USA is building homes without glitch resistors? -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK _______________________________________________ They were, but now they will be. :-) _______________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00280.html (8,484 bytes)

110. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:34:10 EST
As I understand it, arc-fault circuit breakers detect the RF energy from the arc and switch off the circuit. For amateur radio operators, this "improvement" should be even more interesting than GFI b
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00348.html (8,746 bytes)

111. Re: [Amps] 220V wiring: Was Question about safety ground connection (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 06:52:27 EST
That thing tells nothing about HOW the thing works- it reads like it was written by an Ad Flack, not a technical person. If you find a real description, I would like to see it. Bill-W4BSG Bill, Indee
/archives//html/Amps/2005-11/msg00368.html (10,891 bytes)

112. Re: [Amps] NEC-think. (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:56:01 EST
few days ago I ran into a Ham on 40m who is a licensed electrician here in California. so I took the opportunity to ask him why 240v appliances like ovens, dryers and water heaters need a ground wire
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00186.html (6,726 bytes)

113. Re: [Amps] NEC-think. (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:46:13 EST
Without a ground/bond wire wouldn't connecting the Neutral wire to the If the Neutral was connected to the metal case it would not be a neutral, it would be a bond regardless of the color of the wire
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00197.html (7,150 bytes)

114. Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:23:29 EST
Depends on the amplifier type and design, but the most significant factor is usually the rf device and how hard it's run. On tube amplifiers, operator adjustment is likely to dominate over everything
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00272.html (7,146 bytes)

115. Re: [Amps] SB-200 Amp with 811 tubes? (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:14:35 EST
IMHO putting 811's in an Sb-200 is like putting a 4 cyl. engine in a Corvette. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00577.html (7,485 bytes)

116. Re: [Amps] A question! (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:40:07 EST
When looking at the circuit diagram for a Clipperton L there is "an impedance matching circuit" called FI 1 - but one can not see what's in there, anyone who knows? Hello, I am not 100% certain, but
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00104.html (7,217 bytes)

117. Re: [Amps] SB-220 Mod for GS-35b (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:07:58 EST
I wonder if anyone has refitted a Heathkit SB-220 with a GS-35B to replace the 3-500z tubes? I wonder how it went and any info would be of great help. Cheers John VK4AJS Vk4ajs67@optusnet.com.au I ha
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00105.html (8,097 bytes)

118. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:28:21 EST
To me, QSK is an absolute MUST for CW operation. Without it, you're a lid, because you can't hear what's going on while you're transmitting. Well, I guess I am a lid then, however, if you are tramsmi
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00382.html (7,571 bytes)

119. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:53:28 EST
Gee....guess you can include me in your list of lids, there Jim! Over 50 thousand cw contest q's and never a qsk contact among them. And you probably ought to include another 70 thousand from our gro
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00386.html (7,143 bytes)

120. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:17:51 EST
If a DX station is listening on or close to his frequency and has a pileup, which is the usual case in a contest, you have to be able to hear when the DX goes back to someone -- you, for example. If
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00394.html (8,526 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu