Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:TexasRF@aol.com: 490 ]

Total 490 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [Amps] GG in Class C? (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:09:30 EST
Bruce, You can add more cathode bias to accomplish this. Just keep in mind that as you increase the bias voltage more rf drive will be needed to reach a given plate current and power output level. So
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00298.html (7,405 bytes)

102. Re: [Amps] Passive grid triodes? (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:10:20 EST
Bill, this is a wild guess on my part and assuming a linear class of operation: Bias voltage for triodes is much lower typically than a similar power tetrode. To achieve a decent power output level,
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00318.html (8,128 bytes)

103. Re: [Amps] Filter capacitor values (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:51:30 EST
Hal, please tell us more about Tom Hand. This is a new name/source for me. 73, Gerald K5GW In a message dated 2/23/2006 10:33:01 A.M. Central Standard Time, ka1xo@juno.com writes: In my current proje
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00442.html (8,028 bytes)

104. Re: [Amps] isolation xfmr TSPA (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:06:07 EST
When I saw Barrie's email about this I wondered if an isolation transformer is needed. Is it needed? 73, Gerald K5GW In a message dated 2/28/2006 11:57:42 A.M. Central Standard Time, jtml@lanl.gov wr
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00670.html (9,140 bytes)

105. Re: [Amps] Alpha 78 voltage sag (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:35:33 EST
Martin, your hv power supply has a capacitor style filter circuit. The peak current drawn from your AC line can be as high as 10 times the average current. When you observe the 2.5vac sag this is an
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00022.html (10,248 bytes)

106. Re: [Amps] Panasonic "inverter" Switching HV power supply (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 11:05:01 EST
I have not had the time to get back to experimenting with the Panasonic Inverter Microwave oven HV supply. Have any of you had a chance to actually use one? I did some experiments and was able to con
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00229.html (9,022 bytes)

107. Re: [Amps] Boat-Anchor Cleanliness (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:53:08 EST
Hal, I am absolutely in awe of a man having a wife that makes all that acceptable. It is a scenario that the rest of us can only fantasize about! 73, Gerald K5GW In a message dated 3/15/2006 2:43:21
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00401.html (11,104 bytes)

108. [Amps] MW Oven Transformer question (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:41:27 EST
Can someone explain what the shunts in these transformers are about? I can see what looks like a stack of four thin strips of metal placed below the secondary winding through the two core openings. I
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00568.html (7,088 bytes)

109. Re: [Amps] MW Oven Transformer question (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:22:03 EST
Thanks Will and John; I now have an understanding of the heating issues with the MOT. It appears that these transformers are really a poor choice for continuous operation such as a filament power sou
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00572.html (9,741 bytes)

110. Re: [Amps] Big transformer request TSPA (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:42:48 EST
Hi All, just based on the dc voltages produced, not accounting for IR losses, core losses,etc: 3000vdc .5A is 1500 watts delivered to the load. A choke filter typically delivers .9 times rms secondar
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00592.html (10,807 bytes)

111. Re: [Amps] tube impedance, figuring tank circuit values (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:30:07 EST
We are trying to match 50 ohms to the tube plate under full power output conditions for the class of operation. Full power output happens with full drive, maximum plate current and whatever plate vol
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00798.html (10,138 bytes)

112. Re: [Amps] tube impedance, figuring tank circuit values (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:40:12 EST
BTW, on the discussion of k=1.8 vs. 1.87 in the calculations: There is less than 4% difference between these two values. The difference can be covered by only a small "tweak" of the loading and tunin
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00799.html (10,263 bytes)

113. Re: [Amps] tube impedance, figuring tank circuit values (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 12:26:45 EST
Peter, I can't make this information agree with practice. For example, I have a TH347 amplifier on 23cm that runs 3000vdc at 1.8A on the plate. Conventional design would yield a plate impedance of 92
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00001.html (9,126 bytes)

114. Re: [Amps] New vacuum relays (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:16:25 EDT
This info may or may not apply to the relays Rich is offering. Hopefully he can make comment since he can measure the breakdown voltage for his relays. The contact voltage is what we usually worry ab
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00102.html (8,636 bytes)

115. Re: [Amps] New vacuum relays (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:02:37 EDT
Reading in the Jennings catalog: "RJ1H-26s is similar to RJ1A except designed specifically for DC hot load switching". In my mind, this implies that the RJ1A is NOT designed for hot switching. The de
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00145.html (12,147 bytes)

116. Re: [Amps] Plate Impedance (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:03:02 EDT
Jeff, 5400 ohms plate load flies into the face of what we have been calculating using the K factor stuff. 3000v/1A/1.8 is equal to 1666 ohms so one of your numbers is flawed. Using the other method,
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00148.html (14,247 bytes)

117. Re: [Amps] RE : Plate Impedance (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:14:51 EDT
Yes, that should be 3000 divided by 1.8 = 1666.6 ohms. In this case power equals current squared times load resistance which is 1666.6 watts. This power level is consistent with 3000 watts input and
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00155.html (7,153 bytes)

118. Re: [Amps] Plate Impedance (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:51:53 EDT
David is correct; in the RCA TT5 manual, page 53, step 16, it shows Ibmax in the equation. 73/k5gw In a message dated 4/10/2006 7:10:12 P.M. Central Standard Time, dhallam@rapidsys.com writes: Will,
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00156.html (20,356 bytes)

119. Re: [Amps] RCA load impedance calculation (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 07:33:19 EDT
Jeff, I misread your example and took your peak current of 1 A as the average current. Your 5400 ohm plate load is exactly correct for the example and I must sincerely apologize for my confusion. I h
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00169.html (8,927 bytes)

120. Re: [Amps] Plate Impedance, ARRL (score: 1)
Author: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:33:32 EDT
Will and all, as you have determined, the k=1.8 is an approximation that will keep you inside the ballpark at least. Each tube type has it's own characteristics that will cause a shift up or down fro
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00200.html (12,084 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu